By Alan Bean
To taze or not to taze? Here are a few common sense guidelines. Never use a gun when a taser will suffice. Never use a taser when physical restraint will do the job. Never use physical restraint when verbal persuasion will calm the situation.
But can outcomes be anticipated with clinical precision? Highly trained police personnel use better judgment than raw rookies, but when the smoke of danger hangs in the air the easy choice is to shoot first and ask questions later. In that case, the logic suggested by my guidelines is reversed: never shoot a man in the chest if a head shot is available; never use a handgun with a semi-automatic is within reach. Etc.
Taser fans note that tasers are less dangerous than guns, but is that always true? According to the study cited by this New York Times piece, tasers can induce heart failure and death. Frequently, the officer holding the taser had recourse to less drastic measures. Too often, a combination of fear and anger led to repeated and prolonged tasing far out of proportion to the actual threat.
There are no easy answers here, but there can be little doubt that some police departments are overly dependant on taser technology. A skilled officer can defuse most situations with a calm but authoritative manner; the young hot-shot escalates the tension by displaying too much swagger and not enough respect. Racial bias frequently plays into these scenarios, which is why so many tasing deaths are inflicted on minority suspects.
Tasing can be preferable to gun play, but the real issue here is professional police work. Are we willing to invest in quality law enforcement? If not, untrained rookies with itchy trigger fingers will continue to wreak havoc.
By ERICA GOODE
Published: April 30, 2012
The study, which analyzed detailed records from the cases of eight people who went into cardiac arrest after receiving shocks from a Taser X26 fired at a distance, is likely to add to the debate about the safety of the weapons. Seven of the people in the study died; one survived.
Advocacy groups like Amnesty International have argued that Tasers, the most widely used of a class of weapons known as electrical control devices, are potentially lethal and that stricter rules should govern their use.
But proponents maintain that the devices — which are used by more than 16,700 law enforcement agencies in 107 countries, said Steve Tuttle, a spokesman for Taser — pose less risk to civilians than firearms and are safer for police officers than physically tackling a suspect. The results of studies of the devices’ safety in humans have been mixed.
Medical experts said on Monday that the new report, published online on Monday in the journal Circulation, makes clear that electrical shocks from Tasers, which shoot barbs into the clothes and skin, can in some cases set off irregular heart rhythms, leading to cardiac arrest.
“This is no longer arguable,” said Dr. Byron Lee, a cardiologist and director of the electrophysiology laboratory at the University of California, San Francisco. “This is a scientific fact. The national debate should now center on whether the risk of sudden death with Tasers is low enough to warrant widespread use by law enforcement.”
The author of the study, Dr. Douglas P. Zipes, a cardiologist and professor emeritus at Indiana University, has served as a witness for plaintiffs in lawsuits against Taser — a fact that Mr. Tuttle said tainted the findings. “Clearly, Dr. Zipes has a strong financial bias based on his career as an expert witness,” Mr. Tuttle said in an e-mail, adding that a 2011 National Institute of Justice report concluded there was no evidence that Tasers posed a significant risk of cardiac arrest “when deployed reasonably.”
However, Dr. Robert J. Myerburg, a professor of medicine in cardiology at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, said that Dr. Zipes’s role in litigation also gave him extensive access to data from medical records, police records and autopsy reports. The study, he said, had persuaded him that in at least some of the eight cases, the Taser shock was responsible for the cardiac arrests.
“I think when we put together the preponderance of what we know about electrical shocks with his observations, there’s enough to say that the phenomenon occurs,” he said. But he added, “I suspect the incidence of these fatal events is going to be low and can be minimized by the precautions.”
Police officers, he said, should take precautions when using the weapons and avoid multiple shocks, prolonged shocks and shocks to the chest.
“I’d rather see Tasers out there than bullets flying around,” Dr. Myerburg said. “But if you have a choice, if the circumstances allow you to avoid either, then physical restraint should be considered.”